Shychemist

RSS

Posts tagged with "light"

Nov 4
other-wordly:

submitted by |  newterritories submit words | here

other-wordly:

submitted by | newterritories
submit words | here

pretendy:

Some perspective
Light travels at a speed of 299,792,458 metres per second exactly. No matter how fast you, or the light source is traveling, go try measuring it and you’ll find that this is exactly the case.
At this speed, it takes light:
18 milliseconds to travel between London and New York
0.13 seconds to circumnavigate the equator of the Earth
1.4 seconds to travel to us from the Moon
8.4 minutes to travel from the Sun
4.15 hours to travel from the Sun to Neptune, the most remote planet in the Solar System
17 hours to travel to the current location of Voyager 1, the farthest man made object from Earth
~0.8 years to travel from us to the Oort Cloud, a hypothesised spherical cloud of icy comets centered around the Sun, which marks the boundary of the solar system
4.2 years to travel to us from Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to Sun.
1,100 years to travel to us from the centre of our own galaxy, the Milky Way
100,000 years to travel across the whole disc of the galaxy itself
2.5 million years to travel to us from the Andromeda galaxy, our nearest neighbour
110 million years to travel across the Virgo Supercluster, our small, local little corner of the universe
After this it stops making sense to say “a distance x”, as the expansion of the universe warps our perception of distance on these immense timescales. Therefore, when you hear radio static, 1% of that is said not to originate from a place, but rather a time, roughly 13.5 billion years ago - the cosmic microwave background from the time of recombination at the dawn of the universe.
TL;DR: The universe is big.
(Photo: pretendy)

pretendy:

Some perspective

Light travels at a speed of 299,792,458 metres per second exactly. No matter how fast you, or the light source is traveling, go try measuring it and you’ll find that this is exactly the case.

At this speed, it takes light:

  • 18 milliseconds to travel between London and New York
  • 0.13 seconds to circumnavigate the equator of the Earth
  • 1.4 seconds to travel to us from the Moon
  • 8.4 minutes to travel from the Sun
  • 4.15 hours to travel from the Sun to Neptune, the most remote planet in the Solar System
  • 17 hours to travel to the current location of Voyager 1, the farthest man made object from Earth
  • ~0.8 years to travel from us to the Oort Cloud, a hypothesised spherical cloud of icy comets centered around the Sun, which marks the boundary of the solar system
  • 4.2 years to travel to us from Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to Sun.
  • 1,100 years to travel to us from the centre of our own galaxy, the Milky Way
  • 100,000 years to travel across the whole disc of the galaxy itself
  • 2.5 million years to travel to us from the Andromeda galaxy, our nearest neighbour
  • 110 million years to travel across the Virgo Supercluster, our small, local little corner of the universe

After this it stops making sense to say “a distance x”, as the expansion of the universe warps our perception of distance on these immense timescales. Therefore, when you hear radio static, 1% of that is said not to originate from a place, but rather a time, roughly 13.5 billion years ago - the cosmic microwave background from the time of recombination at the dawn of the universe.

TL;DR: The universe is big.

(Photo: pretendy)

Calcium Carbide & Acetylene

Sam combines calcium carbide and ice to produce acetylene - while The Professor discusses old-fashioned car headlights.

More chemistry at http://www.periodicvideos.com/
Follow us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/periodicvideos
And on Twitter at http://twitter.com/periodicvideos
From the School of Chemistry at The University of Nottingham:http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/chemistry/index.aspx

Periodic Videos films are by video journalist Brady Haran:http://www.bradyharan.com/

Our Molecular Videos series is sponsored by Sigma-Aldrich

(Source: youtube.com)

Fluorescence and Phosphorescence

As requested, here is my explanation of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence. :)

Fluorescence and Phosphorescence are two atomic emission processes which produce light.

Fluorescence:

Safety glasses with strong fluorescence under UV light. Source: (Erty’s Laboratory)

When particular types of molecules are struck with energetic photons (typically in the visible to ultraviolet range), their electrons can become excited. The electrons will move from a ground state (stable orbit) to an excited state (higher unstable orbit). As is with most things in this world, nature desires equilibrium. These excited electrons want to return to their natural, stable orbit. They lose their energy over time naturally by their increased vibrations, but some molecules are capable of producing light (photons) to dissipate this excess energy. This is fluorescence.

Fluorescence occurs when the photon emission is between electrons of the same spin state (i.e. goes from the excited state back to the ground state). Fluorescence is typically a short lived process (from 10^-5 to 10^-8s) compared to phosphorescence (which can last from 10^-4 s to hours). Fluorescence is shorter lived but brighter, and when removed from the source will stop ‘glowing’, where as phosphorescence will continue to glow for a while.

Examples of molecules that fluoresce:

-Fluorene

-Quinine (anti-malarial drug)

Unfortunately very few molecules will naturally fluoresce, so when fluorescence is desired fluorescent molecules (fluorophores) can be introduced into the molecule of interest. Fluorescence is used extensively in analytical chemistry, as the light omitted can be quantified with mathematical relationships to reveal the concentration. Fluorescence is also used often in the biological and medical fields to visualize cells and transport of various chemicals in a body.

Phosphorescence:

An example of phosphorescence. Europium doped strontium silicate-aluminate oxide powder (cyan pigmented). Shown under visible light, long-wave UV light, and in total darkness (source wikipedia)

The process of Phosphorescence is very similar to Fluorescence but differs in the time that the energy is released (as mentioned above). In Phosphorescence, electrons are brought to an excited state by energetic photons absorbed by the molecules. In this case, the excited state is called a triplet state. In these triplet states, in particular molecules, they dissipate energy much slower than with fluorescence. The electrons are almost trapped in this higher state, emitting light constantly. I don’t know more than that. To understand it more you’ll need to know quantum physics!

In contrast to fluorescence, phosphorescence compounds are much more common. 

A common real world example of phosphorescence are those glow in the dark stars every kid had on their ceiling. During the day the light from the sun or from lamps excite the electrons in the compounds, from this point on they’re constantly emitting low levels of light. Its only evident when the lights are turned off. 

Examples of molecules that phosphoresce (via wikipedia):

Calcium sulfide with strontium sulfide with bismuth as activator, (Ca,Sr)S:Bi, yields blue light with glow times up to 12 hours, red and orange are modifications of the zinc sulfide formula. Red color can be obtained from strontium sulfide.

Zinc sulfide with about 5 ppm of a copper activator is the most common phosphor for the glow-in-the-dark toys and items. It is also called GS phosphor.

Mix of zinc sulfide and cadmium sulfide emit color depending on their ratio; increasing of the CdS content shifts the output color towards longer wavelengths; its persistence ranges between 1–10 hours.

Sources:

My notes

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03595.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphor#Applications

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence

http://www.tech-faq.com/phosphorescence.html

ichthyologist:

Bioluminescence in fish

Most deep sea  possess bioluminescent organs that are normally dependent on bacteria, maintained in special cells, for the production of the light.

The bacterial light is usually produced as a result of an enzyme (often luciferase) mediated oxidation reaction in which a molecule (often luciferan) changes its shape and emits a single photon of light in the process. Luciferan is a large complex molecule that can later be returned to its original shape through a reduction reaction during which it gains an amount of energy equivalent to the single photon of light it emitted earlier. Because the essential reaction is an oxidation reaction the host organism, in this case the fish, can control the amount of light emitted by controlling the blood flow, and hence the oxygen supply, to the cells containing the bacteria.

Images were taken from This video and remain the property of BBC. Information was from Here

Mar 5

LED's efficiency exceeds 100%

An LED’s power conversion (wall-plug) efficiency varies inversely with its optical output power. Wall-plug efficiency can exceed 100%, the unity efficiency, at low applied voltages and high temperatures. Image credit: Santhanam, et al. ©2012 American Physical Society

For the first time, researchers have demonstrated that an LED can emit more optical power than the electrical power it consumes. Although scientifically intriguing, the results won’t immediately result in ultra-efficient commercial LEDs since the demonstration works only for LEDs with very low input power that produce very small amounts of light.

The researchers, Parthiban Santhanam and coauthors from MIT, have published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

As the researchers explain in their study, the key to achieving a  conversion  above 100%, i.e., “unity efficiency,” is to greatly decrease the applied voltage. According to their calculations, as the voltage is halved, the input power is decreased by a factor of 4, while the emitted light power scales linearly with voltage so that it’s also only halved. In other words, an LED’s efficiency increases as its output power decreases. (The inverse of this relationship - that LED efficiency decreases as its output power increases - is one of the biggest hurdles in designing bright, efficient LED lights.)

In their experiments, the researchers reduced the LED’s input power to just 30 picowatts and measured an output of 69 picowatts of light - an efficiency of 230%. The physical mechanisms worked the same as with any LED: when excited by the applied voltage, electrons and holes have a certain probability of generating photons. The researchers didn’t try to increase this probability, as some previous research has focused on, but instead took advantage of small amounts of excess heat to emit more power than consumed. This heat arises from vibrations in the device’s atomic lattice, which occur due to entropy.

This light-emitting process cools the  slightly, making it operate similar to a thermoelectric cooler. Although the cooling is insufficient to provide practical cooling at room temperature, it could potentially be used for designing lights that don’t generate heat. When used as a heat pump, the device might be useful for solid-state cooling applications or even power generation.

Theoretically, this low-voltage strategy allows for an arbitrarily efficient generation of photons at low voltages. For this reason, the researchers hope that the technique could offer a new way to test the limits of energy-efficiency electromagnetic communication.

More information: Parthiban Santhanam, et al. “Thermoelectrically Pumped Light-Emitting Diodes Operating above Unity Efficiency.” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 097403 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.097403

via: Physics

Mar 3
dearscience:

northtwin (by frogchuter)

This is just stunning. Sky in a puddle on a huge scale.

dearscience:

northtwin (by frogchuter)

This is just stunning. Sky in a puddle on a huge scale.

thequantumlife:
Replacing Electricity With Light: First Physical ‘Metatronic’ Circuit Created

The technological world of the 21st century owes a tremendous amount to advances in electrical engineering, specifically, the ability to finely control the flow of electrical charges using increasingly small and complicated circuits. And while those electrical advances continue to race ahead, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania are pushing circuitry forward in a different way, by replacing electricity with light.
“Looking at the success of electronics over the last century, I have always wondered why we should be limited to electric current in making circuits,” said Nader Engheta, professor in the electrical and systems engineering department of Penn’s School of Engineering and Applied Science. “If we moved to shorter wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum — like light — we could make things smaller, faster and more efficient.”
Different arrangements and combinations of electronic circuits have different functions, ranging from simple light switches to complex supercomputers. These circuits are in turn built of different arrangements of circuit elements, like resistors, inductors and capacitors, which manipulate the flow of electrons in a circuit in mathematically precise ways. And because both electric circuits and optics follow Maxwell’s equations — the fundamental formulas that describe the behavior of electromagnetic fields — Engheta’s dream of building circuits with light wasn’t just the stuff of imagination. In 2005, he and his students published a theoretical paper outlining how optical circuit elements could work.
Now, he and his group at Penn have made this dream a reality, creating the first physical demonstration of “lumped” optical circuit elements. This represents a milestone in a nascent field of science and engineering Engheta has dubbed “metatronics.”

thequantumlife:

Replacing Electricity With Light: First Physical ‘Metatronic’ Circuit Created

The technological world of the 21st century owes a tremendous amount to advances in electrical engineering, specifically, the ability to finely control the flow of electrical charges using increasingly small and complicated circuits. And while those electrical advances continue to race ahead, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania are pushing circuitry forward in a different way, by replacing electricity with light.

“Looking at the success of electronics over the last century, I have always wondered why we should be limited to electric current in making circuits,” said Nader Engheta, professor in the electrical and systems engineering department of Penn’s School of Engineering and Applied Science. “If we moved to shorter wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum — like light — we could make things smaller, faster and more efficient.”

Different arrangements and combinations of electronic circuits have different functions, ranging from simple light switches to complex supercomputers. These circuits are in turn built of different arrangements of circuit elements, like resistors, inductors and capacitors, which manipulate the flow of electrons in a circuit in mathematically precise ways. And because both electric circuits and optics follow Maxwell’s equations — the fundamental formulas that describe the behavior of electromagnetic fields — Engheta’s dream of building circuits with light wasn’t just the stuff of imagination. In 2005, he and his students published a theoretical paper outlining how optical circuit elements could work.

Now, he and his group at Penn have made this dream a reality, creating the first physical demonstration of “lumped” optical circuit elements. This represents a milestone in a nascent field of science and engineering Engheta has dubbed “metatronics.”

nminusone:

Bioluminescence -  the production and emission of light by a living organism.

nminusone:

Bioluminescence -  the production and emission of light by a living organism.